7204 200 815vikasford@gmail.com

Sunday, August 25, 2013

Crowdtilt (YC W12) launches Crowdhoster, the world's most flexible open source crowd funding platform

Crowdtilt (YC W12) launches Crowdhoster, the world's most flexible open source crowd funding platform

 

Thanks to the JOBS Act and the rise of Kickstarter, Indiegogo and the parade of startups that have emerged in their wake, crowdfunding has gone mainstream. However, according to the minds behind Crowdtilt — the Y Combinator-incubated platform that caters to the many types of “group fundraising” that fall outside the purview of Kickstarter — this is just Phase One. The Crowdfunding Era is just beginning.
While the Kickstarters and Indiegogos continue to dominate headlines in the crowdfunding space, a growing set of niche platforms have emerged to handle the spillover from projects that don’t fit under the traditional umbrella. And some are bypassing platforms altogether: Star Citizen, a space-age video game, recently became the most successful crowdfunding campaign yet, raising a whopping $15 million — on its own site.
With projects like Lockitron, Basis and Myo also joining the list of projects that have raised big bucks without the help of traditional platforms, Crowdtilt founder and CEO James Beshara believes this is a strong indication of where crowdfunding is headed. The writing is on the wall.
That’s why Crowdtilt is today launching the first public version of Crowdhoster — its full-featured, open-source, customizable crowdfunding tool that will allow anyone to launch their own campaign without having to touch a line of code. Built using Crowdtilt’s API, Crowdhoster gives both individuals or businesses the ability to set up and own their own crowdfunding page.
Read the full article on Techcrunch

 

No comments

3rd Largest Internet Population By Jayadevan P K

India has overtaken Japan to become the world’s third largest Internet population with nearly 15% of the users coming from non PC devices, according to a new report.
The report by comScore, said that India added 17.6 mn users in the last year, clocking a year on year increase of 31%. With an extended online universe in excess of 145 mn, the market is at a tipping point for online businesses. Comscore 1
India’s year on year online population growth is second only to Brazil, which grew 37% year on year.
Comscore 2
Non PC devices, which constituted 14.2% of the online population, is starting to accelerate in 2013 as the share of PC users accessing the internet slows down. Of the Non PC users, 77% were on wi-fi and the rest on mobile.
Comscore 3
Weather, car rental, blogs, entertainment and music are categories that are increasingly being accessed on the go.
Highlights of the report
  • 73.9 million Indian surfed the web using a home or work computer.
  • India’s online population skews significantly younger than other BRIC countries with 75% under the age of 35.
  • Females comprise 39% of the Indian Internet population. Women also spend less time online than men. Women aged 35-44 are heaviest Internet users among age/ gender groups while 25-34 year old men are the heaviest Internet users.
  • Social networking captures large share of PC screen time in India.
Comscore 4
  • Blogs are the fastest growing web category in India, adding 11.6 mn new users.
  • Google was the top web property in India followed by Facebook and Yahoo Sites. People spend a whopping 217.7 minutes on Facebook on an average as compared to 167.9 on Google sites and 72.1 on Yahoo sites.
Comscore 5
  • Social networking continues to grow in India with 86% of Indian web users visiting a social network. There are been a 28% increase in Facebook visitors in the last 12 months. In this category, Linkedin and Twitter were at number 2 and 3 respectively.
  • Online retail in India, is underdeveloped as compared to its BRIC peers. Myntra grew the number of users and leads the category with Flipkart, Jabong and Amazon following closely. Apparel, Computer and Electronics sites and comparison shopping were the largest categories in e-commerce.
Comscore 7
comscore 8
  • With 31.5 million viewers watching videos on YouTube, nearly 74% of Internet users in India visited an entertainment site. There was a 27% year on year increase in online video audience.
comscore 9
  • While Facebook, Yahoo! and YouTube grew further, Metacafe, Times Internet and Vdopia lost visitors.
  • The news/ information market is also underdeveloped vs BRIC peers. An average of 33.5 minutes are spent on these sites.
  • Newspapers and general news sites garner the most attention.
  • Blogs have seen high growth in India over the past year but engagement remains low. The reach of blogs category was at 49% in India and an average of 10.3 minutes are spent on them.
comscore 10
Travel category gets more users than the global average. Comscore 11
  • India is now the 4th largest audience of searchers in the world. Unique searches in India grew by 28%. On an average there were 94.5 searches per searcher as compared to a global average of 119.7 searches per searcher. Google dominates the search market with over 90% market share.
Comscore 12
Full report here(pdf).

» If you are an app developer, come over for bigMobilityConf (scheduled for Aug 31st). Lot more insights on app ecosystem will be shared by Industry bigwigs.
2 comments

Order with FREE AmazonGlobal Saver Shipping


If your order is $125 or over and being shipped to India or Singapore, you may qualify for FREE AmazonGlobal Saver Shipping. With AmazonGlobal Saver Shipping, your order will be delivered 9-14 business days after all of your items are available to ship, including pre-order items.
To place an order:
  1. Add at least $125 of eligible AmazonGlobal Saver products to your Shopping Cart. Note: Items must be eligible for the AmazonGlobal Program and sold by Amazon.com.
  2. Proceed to checkout.
  3. Ship your items to a single address in India or Singapore.
  4. Select Group my items into as few shipments as possible as your shipping preference.
  5. Select AmazonGlobal Saver Shipping as your shipping speed.
Note: AmazonGlobal Saver Shipping may be used with a promotion code. The qualifying amount is the total amount of the products purchased before the promotion code is applied.
You can review the full program requirements on our About FREE AmazonGlobal Saver Shipping page.
No comments

60 Minutes From Our Store to Your Door! By @MYNTRA

 60 Minutes From Our Store to Your Door (India) (blog.myntra.com)

We’re always looking for new ways to delight our amazing shoppers, and that was the thought behind our latest pilot run where we delivered orders within an hour of placement. Delighted customers received orders in an hour or two of placing them, much to their pleasant surprise.
Shopping in metros can become a long-drawn and cumbersome process, thanks to congested roads and restricted parking. This pilot was our effort to bridge the gap between online and offline shopping to create a hassle-free shopping experience. Our Chief Operating Officer, Ganesh Subramanian, believes that innovations like this will change the public’s perceptions of online shopping. He further added that our state-of-the-art warehouse management system and streamlined processes helped in building a solid framework for effective logistics and deliveries.
Take a look at the exciting journey from the time an order is placed to the happy faces of the customers when they receive it. This video follows the events that unfold after that one click of a button that places the order – sparking off a chain of events from our warehouse executives picking the order in quick precision, to the energetic Style Delivery Associates weaving their way through the urban jungle to deliver your order.

One of our regular customers, Sabir Chaudhary, who was extremely pleased with this quick service said, “I’ve never seen anyone deliver within an hour of order placement. This is really impressive. This will change the entire shopping experience in India.”
We certainly hope so!
No comments

My Advice for Starting a Business By Leo Babauta

My Advice for Starting a Business : zenhabits (zenhabits.net) 
Recently I encouraged my 13-year-old daughter Maia to start a vegan cupcake business, and it’s so exciting to watch her get started.
As I talked to her about starting, she had some worries:
  • She didn’t know how.
  • She didn’t know what kind of business to create.
  • She was worried she’d fail.
Do any of those sound familiar? Those were my worries too, when I had a day job and thought about building something of my own.
Worry about not knowing what to do, how to do it, and whether you’ll fail … these stop so many people from starting.
I’ve launched numerous ventures, from ebooks to courses to my Sea Change membership program and more. Next week, I’m launching a new video interview series called The Habits of Entrepreneurs, and can barely wait to show it to you.
Today, I’d like to share the lessons I’ve learned about starting a business, in hopes of encouraging you to get started making something you love.
  1. Look for opportunities. This is from my friend Hiten Shah, who will be featured in the Habits of Entrepreneurs series. Keep your eyes open for opportunities — what pain points do people have, what problems need to be solved, how can you make people’s lives better?
  2. If you can’t wait to get started, you’re onto something. Every time I’ve gotten my best ideas, I get excited. I tell people about it. I might even stay up at night thinking about it. I can’t sit down for long from the excitement.
  3. Start small. People try to build their new business into a massive launch, but this is a mistake. Start as small as possible, giving a minimum viable product to a few friends, and let them test it out. Then a few more people. When you try to do something massive at launch, you make it less likely that you’ll actually start, and you’ll take forever to launch, and you’ll build yourself up for failure, and you’re building something massive without any idea of whether it works or if people like it. Launch is just one moment in the lifespan of a business, and it’s not even one of the most important moments.
  4. Not starting is the biggest mistake. I told Maia that the worst-case scenario — if the business fails — is not even bad. If she starts the vegan cupcake business and fails, at least she got to make and eat some delicious cupcakes, and share them with friends, and learn some valuable lessons along the way. She can always start something new after that. In fact, this scenario of learning something and having fun along the way, even in “failure”, is demonstrably better than if she’d not started at all.
  5. Start a blog. The best way to market a business is by giving away free information. Show that you’re valuable, help people for free, and they’ll want more from you.
  6. Don’t do SEO or social media market or viral marketing. Those don’t add any value for your customers.
  7. Instead, be super valuable. Build something great, and word of mouth is all the marketing you need (including people passing on your best blog posts). Overdeliver. They’ll love you, and you won’t need to do slimy SEO techniques.
  8. Start lean. I started my businesses with zero money, and just found free or cheap services to start with. Only after I started making some revenue did I pay for anything, or hire anyone. Make money as soon as possible by selling something valuable.
  9. Advertising is a bad business model. When you make money from ads, what are you selling? Your audience’s attention. This is horrible, and your audience/customers won’t love you for it. Instead, do everything possible to delight your audience/customers, and give them incredible value, and they’ll gladly pay for it.
  10. Forget about numbers. More specifically, forget about hitting certain targets. A million pageviews, ten thousand subscribers, half a million in revenues. Those are meaningless and arbitrary. Instead, worry about how much you’re helping your customers. How much value are you giving them? How can you make them smile? Try putting some numbers on those things.
  11. The joy doesn’t come later. Lots of times people kill themselves trying to reach a goal, or hit an amazing launch. They hope that achieving this goal will change their lives. Then they get there, and their lives aren’t different. They move on to the next goal. The joy doesn’t come when you hit the goal, or have an amazing launch. The joy comes right now. This is the moment of greatness, of satisfaction with yourself and what you’re doing. Not later.
  12. Forget perfection. Too many people get caught up in trying to make a product, website, blog post, launch, etc. perfect. It’ll never be perfect. Perfection is stopping you from shipping. Instead, do what you can, get it out there, get feedback, improve it, repeat.
  13. Screw the business plan. Planning, like perfection, is useless and stands in your way. Sure, you want to think things through, but planning is based on faulty information (we can’t know the future). Instead, experiment. Get started. Do. Then see what happens, and adjust. Flexibility is much more important than a good plan.
  14. Start from home, and start with friends. You don’t need to have an office for most businesses … even a cupcake business doesn’t need a shop — at least not at first. Start with no extra money, in your spare time if you have to. Let your first customers be your friends, and ask them to be brutally honest. Then let them spread the word to their friends. That’s a Zero-Dollar Launch.
  15. Focus on important things. Too often people get caught up in statistics, social media, lots of little tasks that don’t matter. Instead, get moving on what matters most — producing something that will add value to your customers.
  16. Surround yourself with interesting people. Having friends who are doing fascinating things is inspiring, and they will give you great advice and feedback. The people around you, and their positive and inspiring attitudes, matter.
  17. Learn to be OK with not knowing. You won’t know what will happen with the business. The world is changing. Your business will change. You will change. You don’t know anything, really, and that’s OK. Read more.
Get started, my friends! You’ll love it.

The Habits of Entrepreneurs

My new video interview series launches Monday:



Why is this series important?
  1. Inspiration: these are fascinating entrepreneurs doing amazing things.
  2. Habits matter — what you do daily creates your business.
  3. Building habits is hard — seeing how others create habits helps overcome obstacles.
More soon!

No comments

A Platform Thinking approach to building a business By Sangeet Paul Choudary

Building a business through repeatable operations (platformed.info) 
 
Every business is an engine. It needs to do a certain set of things repeatedly to create value. If you haven’t figured out that set of repeated operations, you probably haven’t created a scalable business yet.
Ford needs to repeatedly assemble cars, Google needs to repeatedly run its crawler, Facebook needs to repeatedly get users to interact with other users.

The Business Engine and Repeatable Operations

Every business goes through three stages:
Creating the engine: Early stage, figuring out the set of repeatable operations it needs to do to create value.
Oiling the engine: Rapid testing and iterating to refine and optimize the repeatable operations
Stepping on the gas: Scaling by repeating the repeatable operations

Three approaches to building a business

So this is the formula for building a business. You figure out how you are creating value. You identify a set of operations that repeatedly create value. You figure out a way to efficiently conduct these operations repeatedly.
There are three broad ways that businesses conduct these operations repeatedly and get things done:
  1. Get employees to do the work
  2. Get algorithms to do the work
  3. Get users to do the work

Let’s think through the problem of navigating the web for the most relevant information for the day. Three companies try to solve this in three very different ways:
Yahoo: A bunch of editors decide the best content for the day
Google News: Algorithms decide the top news of the day
Twitter: Users’ tweets and retweets decide the top news of the day.
For those of us who read the earlier article on the three broad models for problem-solving, here’s the interesting part. These three approaches correspond exactly with the three models for problem solving.

A brief recap of the three approaches to problem solving
The ‘stuff’ approach: How can we create more stuff whenever the problem crops up?
The ‘optimization’ approach: How can we better distribute the stuff already created to minimize waste?
The ‘platform’ approach: How can we redefine ‘stuff’ and find new ways of solving the same problem?

Essentially, the three approaches to building a business now are:
The ‘stuff’ approach: Get employees to do the work
The ‘optimization’ approach: Get algorithms to do the work
The ‘platform’ approach: Get users to do the work

Depending on which approach you take, the way you build your company could vary significantly.
A platform thinking approach to building a business involves figuring out ways by which an external ecosystem of developers and users can be leveraged to create value. The iPhone app store does this, YouTube does this, and so does Wikipedia.

Understanding Repeatable Operations

It’s important to note that we are talking about repeatable operations. Writing code is not a repeatable operation. It is a one-time infrastructural activity, similar to building out the assembly line or setting up the factory. The operations that the code automates (e.g. login management) are the repeatable operations.

Why ecosystems, not algorithms, are your competitive advantage

Most problems that could be fully automated are already automated today. The next level of scale will come not by automating alone (and letting algorithms alone do the work) but by leveraging an ecosystem ( and letting algorithms synchronize disparate actions).
There are very few companies that compete purely on the strength of algorithms. Google is a rare example of a company whose competitive advantage lies in a set of very complex algorithms that it fiercely protects. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube etc. compete not on the strength of their algorithms but on the strength of their ecosystems. The algorithms are easily replicable but the ecosystems aren’t. Hence, building a business where the ecosystem scales the value creating operations is quite different from building a technology-only company.

Platform Thinking and Scale Considerations

Scale is achieved by making repeatable processes more efficient (faster/cheaper) and effective (accurate).
One of the ways to infuse platform thinking into your business is to look at a problem that is being solved manually, and repeatedly, and see if it can be solved by external users instead.
Facebook realized that it would have to translate its interface for every new foreign language. The norm was to do it with an in-house or outsourced translation team. Facebook chose to crowdsource it, building not just a more scalable model, but in many cases, better translations as well.
This is also demonstrated in the evolution of an online community. Quora started off with employees asking questions and answering them. Over time, it transitioned both these activities from the employees to the users.
The problem that comes with this, of course, is that you let out control and with that you need to build in checks and balances to ensure that no one is gaming the system. Quora and Reddit offer good examples of bringing in these checks and balances and scaling them along with the community.

The Three Questions Framework

What are the repeated chunks of work in my business?
The first part involves identifying the activities that need to be repeated to scale and expand the business.
Who is doing the work today? 
Secondly, is the work being done manually or algorithmically? If so, can we bring in greater efficiencies (speed) or effectiveness (accuracy) by leveraging an ecosystem?
How can we get someone else to do that work? 
Finally, users,  like employees, need incentives. Fitting in the right organic and inorganic incentives forms an important part of relying on an external ecosystem to build value.
 
No comments

The Ultimate Cheat Sheet For Starting And Running Your Business By James Altucher

The Ultimate Cheat Sheet For Starting And Running Your Business (techcrunch.com)
 
Editor’s note: James Altucher is an investor, programmer, author, and several-times entrepreneur. His latest book, “Choose Yourself!” (foreword by Dick Costolo, CEO of Twitter) came out on June 3. Follow him on Twitter @jaltucher.
This is going be a bullet FAQ on starting a business. No joke. If you’re a lawyer, feel free to disagree with me, so you can charge someone your BS fees to give the same advice. If you can think of anything to add, please do so. I might be missing things. If you want to argue with me, feel free. I might be wrong on any of the items below.
There are many types of business. Depending on your business, some of these won’t apply. All of these questions come from questions I’ve been asked.
The rules are: I’m going to give no explanations. Just listen to me.
1) C Corp or S Corp or LLC?
C-Corp if you ever want to take on investors or sell to another company.
2) What state should you incorporate in?
Delaware.
3) Should founders vest?
Yes, over a period of four years. On any change of control the vesting speeds up.
4) Should you go for venture capital money?
First build a product, then get a customer, then get friends-and-family money (or money from revenues which is cheapest of all) and then think about raising money. But only then. Don’t be an amateur.
5) Should you patent your idea?
Get customers first. Patent later. Don’t talk to lawyers until the last possible moment.
6) Should you require venture capitalists to sign NDAs?
No. Nobody is going to steal your idea.
7) How much equity should you give a partner?
Divide things up into these categories: manage the company; raise the money; had the idea; brings in the revenues; built the product (or performs the services). Divide up in equal portions.
8) Should you have a technical co-founder if you are not technical?
No. If you don’t already have a technical co-founder you can always outsource technology and not give up equity.
9) Should you barter equity for services?
No. You get what you pay for.
10) How do you market your app?
Friends and then word of mouth.
11) Should you build a product?
Maybe. But first see if, manually, your product works. Then think about providing it as a service. Then productize the commonly used services. Too many people do this in reverse and then fail.
12) How much dilution is too much dilution?
If someone wants to give you money, then take it. The old saying, 100 percent of nothing is worth less than 1 percent of something.
13) Do you listen to venture capitalist?
Yes, of course. They gave you money. But then don’t do anything they ask you to do.
14) What if nobody seems to be buying your product?
Then change to a service and do whatever anyone is willing to pay for using the skills you developed while making your product.
("you're going to rattle the stars, you are")
“You’re gonna rattle the stars, you are.”
15) If a client wants you to hire their friend or they won’t give you the business (e.g. like a bribe) what should you do?
Always do the ethical thing: Hire the friend and get the client’s business.
16) What do you do when a customer rejects you in a B2B business?
Stay in touch once a month. Never be angry.
17) In a B2C business?
Release fast. Add new features every week.
18) How do you get new clients?
The best new clients are old clients. Always offer new services. Think every day of new services to offer old clients.
19) What’s the best thing to do for a new client?
Over-deliver for the first 100 days. Then you will never lose them.
20) What if your client asks you to do something not in your business plan?
Do it, or find someone who can do it, even if it’s a competitor.
21) Should I ever focus on SEO?
No.
22) Should I do social media marketing?
No.
23) Should I ever talk badly about a partner of an employee even though they are awful?
Never gossip. Always be straight with the culprit.
24) I have lots of ideas. How do I pick the right one?
Do as many ideas as possible. The right idea will pick you.
25) What is the sign of an amateur?
– Asking for an NDA.
– Trying to raise VC money before product or customers.
– Having fights with partners in the first year. Fire them or split before anything gets out of control.
– Worrying about dilution.
– Trying to get Mark Cuban to invest because “this would be great for the Dallas Mavericks.”
– Asking people you barely know to introduce you to Mark Cuban.
– Asking people for five minutes of their time. It’s never five minutes, so you are establishing yourself as a liar.
– Having a PowerPoint that doesn’t show me arbitrage. I need to know that there is a small chance there is a 100x return on money.
– Catch 22: showing people there’s a small chance there’s 100x return on their money. The secret of salesmanship is getting through the Catch 22.
– Rejecting a cash offer for your company when you have almost no revenues. Hello Friendster and Foursquare.
26) What is the sign of a professional?
– Going from bullshit product to services to product to SaaS product. (Corollary: the reverse is amateur hour).
– Cutting costs every day.
– Selling every day, every minute.
– When you have a billion in revenues, staying focused. When you have zero revenues, staying unfocused and coming up with new ideas every day.
– Saying “no” to people who are obvious losers.
– Saying “yes” to any meeting at all with someone who is an obvious winner.
– Knowing how to distinguish between winners and losers (subject of an entire other post but in your gut you know — trust me).
27) When should I hire people full time?
When you have revenues
28) How long does it take to raise money?
In a GREAT business, six months. In a mediocre business, infinity.
29) Should I get an office?
No, not unless you have revenues.
30) Should I do market research?
Yes, find one customer who DEFINITELY, without a doubt, will buy a service from you. Note that I don’t say buy your product, because your initial product is always not what the customer wanted.
31) Should I pay taxes?
No. You should always reinvest your money and operate at a loss.
32) Should I pay dividends?
See above.
33) What should the CEO salary be?
No more than 2x your lowest employee if you are not profitable. This even assumes you are funded. If you are not funded your salary should be zero until your revenues can pay your salary last. Important RULE: the CEO salary is the last expense paid in every business.
34) When should I fire employees?
When you have fewer than six months’ burn in the bank and you aren’t getting revenues growing fast enough.
35) When should you have sex with an employee?
When you love her and the feeling is mutual.
36) What other reasons should one fire an employee?
– When they gossip.
– When they don’t over-deliver constantly.
– When they ask for a raise because they think they are making below industry standard.
– When they talk badly about a client.
– When they have an attitude.
37) When should you give a raise?
Rarely.
38) How big should the employee option pool be?
15 to 20 percent.
39) How much do advisers get?
One-fourth of 1 percent. Advisers are useless. Don’t even have an advisory board.
40) How much do board members get?
Nothing. They should all be investors. If they aren’t an investor, then one-half of 1 percent.
41) What if one client is almost all of my revenues?
Treat them very nicely. Don’t forget the Christmas gift basket.
42) What’s the best way to sell anything?
Show arbitrage: If they pay X now they are buying something worth X * Y. That is the ONLY way to sell.
43) What is the best way to sell anything?
Part II: fear and agitation. Get them afraid (the world is falling apart). Get them agitated (this is the only way to stop it).
44) What’s the best way to talk about your competition in a meeting?
Use “choice ambiguity” (Google it). Say, “all of my competition is great. I wouldn’t even know how to choose among them.”
45) What’s the best way to value a company?
Ask yourself (no BS): How much would it cost to recreate the technology, services, brand and customers you have already built. Then quadruple it and see what people would pay.
46) Should I ever worry about the news or the economy?
Absolutely not. The best businesses are started in horrible economies.
47) What happened to all of my friends?
You don’t have anymore friends.
48) How do I charge more for my services?
Itemize as finely as possible and charge for each item.
49) Do I charge per hour or per project or per month?
First per project, then per-month maintenance.
50) How do I prepare for a meeting?
Know everything about the clients: competition, employees, industry. Over-read everything.
(read everything)
Read everything.
51) What is the only effective email marketing?
Highly targeted email marketing written by professional copywriters, and the email list is made up of people who have bought similar services in the past six months.
51a) Corollary: If you have zero skills as a copywriter then everything you write will be boring.
52) Should I give stuff for free?
Maybe. But don’t expect free customers to turn into paying customers. Your free customers actually hate you and want everything from you for nothing, so you better have a different business model.
53) Should I have schwag?
No.
54) Should I go to SXSW?
No.
55) Should I go to industry parties and meetups?
No.
56) Should I blog?
Yes. You must. Blog about everything going wrong in your industry. Blog personal stories that you think will scare away customers. They won’t. Customers will be attracted to honesty.
57) Should I care about margins?
No. Care about revenues.
58) Should I spin-off this unrelated idea into a separate business?
No. Make one business great. Throw everything in it. Do DBAs to identify different ideas.
59) Should I hire people because I can travel on a seven-hour plane ride with them?
Don’t be an idiot. If anything, hire people the opposite of you. Or else who will you delegate to?
60) When should I say “no” to a client?
When they approach you.
61) When should I say “yes” to a client?
Every other conversation you ever have with them after that initial “no.”
62) Should I have sex with an employee?
Stop asking that.
63) Should I negotiate the best terms with a VC?
No. Pick the VC you like. Times are going to get tough at some point, and you need to be able to have a heart-to-heart with them.
64) Should I even start a business?
No. Make money. Build shit. Then start a business.
65) Should I give employees bonuses for a job well done?
No. Give them gifts but not bonuses.
66) What should I do at Christmas?
Send everyone you know a gift basket.
67) If my customer just got divorced, what should I say to him?
“I can introduce you to lots of women/men.”
68) When should I give up on my idea?
When you can’t generate revenues, customers, interest, for two months.
69) Why didn’t the VC or customer call back after we met yesterday and it was great?
They hate you.
70) Why didn’t the above call back after we met yesterday and it was great?
“Yesterday” was like a split second ago for them and a lifetime for you. There’s the law of entrepreneurial relativity. Figure out what that means and live by it.
71) Should I hire a professional CEO?
No. Never.
72) Should I hire a head of sales?
No. The founder is the head of sales until at least 10 million in sales.
73) My client called at 3 a.m. Should I tell him to respect boundaries?
No. You no longer have any boundaries.
74) I made a mistake. Should I tell the client?
Yes. Tell him everything that happened. You’re his partner. Not the guy that hides things and then lies about them.
75) My investors want me to focus.
Should I listen to them? No. Diversify in every way you can.
76) I personally need money. Should I borrow from the business?
Only if the business can survive for another six months no matter what.
77) I just bought two companies. Should I put them under the same roof and start consolidating?
No. Not for at least two years.
78) Should I quit my job?
No. Only if you have salary that can pay you for six months at your startup. Aim to quit your job but don’t quit your job.
79) What do I do when I have doubts?
Ask your customers if your doubts are trustworthy.
80) I have too much competition. What should I do?
Competition is good. It shows you have a decent business model. Now simply outperform them.
81) My wife/husband thinks I spend too much time on my startup?
Divorce them or close your business.
82) I’m starting my business, but I have relationship problems. What should I do?
Get rid of your relationship.
83) Should I expand geographically as quickly as possible?
No. Get all the business you can in your local area. Travel is too expensive time-wise.
84) How do I keep clients from yelling at me?
Document every meeting line-by-line, and send your document to the client right after the meeting.
85) I undercharged. What should I do about it?
Nothing. Charge the next client more.
86) I have an idea for an app but don’t know how to execute. What should I do?
Draw every screen and function. Then outsource someone to make the drawings look like they come from a real app. Then outsource the development of the app. Get a specific schedule. Micromanage the schedule.
87) I want to buy a franchise in X. Is that a good idea?
Only buy a franchise if it’s underperforming and you can see how to improve it. Don’t buy on future hopes; only buy on past mistakes.
88) I want to buy a franchise in X. Is that a good idea?
Rely on the three Ds: Death, Debt, Divorce. When someone dies, the heirs will sell a business cheap. When someone is in debt, they will sell a business cheap. When someone divorces, the couple usually has to sell a business cheap. IMPORTANT: even if the trends in the industry are in your favor, you CANNOT predict the future. But you can use the past to help you get a deal. Always get a deal.
89) I have a lot of traffic but no revenues. What should I do?
Sell your business. There’s only one Google. (Well, there are two or three Googles: Facebook, Twitter … )
90) I have no traffic. How do I get traffic?
Shut down your business.
91) Should I hire a PR firm?
No. Do guerilla marketing. Read “Newsjacking” and “Trust me I’m Lying.” PR firms screw up from beginning to end. The first time I hired a PR firm, instead of sending me my contract they accidentally sent me their contract for “Terry Bradshaw.” He was paying $12,000 a month. Was it worth it for him?
92) My competition is doing better than me across every metric. What should I do?
Don’t be afraid to instantly shut down your business and start over if you can’t sell it. Time is a horrible thing to waste.
93) I’ve been in business now for six years, and my business doesn’t seem to be growing. It’s even slowing down. What should I do?
Come up with 10 ideas a day about new services your business can offer. Try to get a customer for each new service. I know one business in this situation that refuses to do this because their VCs are telling them to focus more. You’re going to go out of business otherwise.
94) Is it unethical to run my business from the side while still at my job?
I don’t know. Did God tell you that in a dream?
95) My customer called me at 5 p.m. on a Friday and said, “We have to talk.” And now I can’t talk to him until Monday. What does it mean?
It means you’re fired.
96) XYZ just sold for $100 million. Should I be valued at that? I’m better!
No, you should shut up.
97) Investors want to meet me and customers want to meet me. Who do I meet if I need money?
You should know the answer to that by now.
98) If an acquirer asks me why I want to sell, what should I say?
That you feel it would be easier for you to grow in the context of a bigger company that has experienced the growing pains you are just starting to go through. That 1+1 = 45.
99) I just started my business. What should I do?
Sell it as fast as possible (applies in 99 percent of situations). Sell for cash.
100) I can change the world with my technology.
No you can’t.
100a) Corollary: Don’t smoke crack.
101) If you’re so smart why aren’t you a billionaire?
Because I sold my businesses early, lost everything, started new businesses, sold them, and got lucky every now and then.
101a) Corollary: These rules don’t always apply. But like Kurt Vonnegut said, “if you want to break the rules of grammar, first learn the rules of grammar.”
RULE #infinity:
You create your luck by being healthy and not regretting the past or being anxious about the future.
 
No comments

Protecting a Business Idea by Alex Genadinik

Protecting business ideas: pros and cons (problemio.com) 
This is a very controversial topic. Many people say that you should be open about your ideas while many people try very hard to protect their ideas as much as possible.
As it sometimes happens in such situations, the truth is probably somewhere in between. In this article we will examine a few approaches and the main considerations for each, and let you decide what is ultimately right for you to do with your ideas.

Protecting Ideas With An NDA (Non Disclosure Agreement)

An NDA is a legal document binding whoever signs it to not disclose to others what you disclose to them while telling them about your company. NDA agreements are effective to a point, but they also have a number of loopholes and ways to side-step the agreement.
Essentially, they do offer a thin layer of protection. But they do have a downside. Making people sign NDA documents can irritate people. It also costs time and money to craft the document. You can be using that time and money to actually build your business. Another disadvantage of NDA documents is that many people simply refuse to sign them. Many investors, for example, never sign NDA documents simply because they see too many companies and cannot put themselves under such restrictions due to the needs of their work. And lastly, to enforce your NDA agreement, you actually have to litigate, which is not a very simple thing to do.

Protecting Business Ideas With Patents

Patents cannot protect ideas. Patents are made to protect real inventions. The only reason they are mentioned in this article is because many people tend to confuse the purpose of patents and think they can protect business ideas. For 99% of cases, patents cannot protect ideas.

Asking People You Trust

This is an underestimated and rarely discussed point, but it is incredibly important to work with people whom you can trust. That can make many things about your company much less riskier from the beginning and as you grow the company. No lawyer can craft you a document long enough to protect you from every possible danger. But surrounding yourself with trustworthy and ethical people will go a long way to not needing such legal protection in the first place.

What If You Do Not Protect Your Idea?

Consider what happens if you do not protect your idea at all. Everyone will be free to steal is. Let's consider who actually will go ahead and steal it. First of all, not everyone will like the idea as much as you do. Second, people are busy with their own projects and do not usually just go ahead and stop everything to pursue the stolen idea.
The ironic thing is that an idea is just an idea. It is theory. And in business, theory is worth less than practice. Which brings us to the point of what happens when you actually make your idea a reality.

Once You Are Operational, Everyone Sees And Can Steal Your Idea. It Is Most Attractive To Steal Once It Is A Success

The most ironic thing is that the business idea of any business stops to become a secret once the business actually opens. Furthermore, if the business is successful, it will be attractive to copy since whoever would be copying would see proof that the business idea can work.

When Protecting Your Idea Harms Your Business

Whether you ultimately decide to protect your idea or be more open with it, one of the common business idea mistakes can be to be so protective of the idea that it hinders getting quality feedback to your business. There are ways to discuss your business idea with others without giving away and secret information. Take a look at our tutorial to pitch your business.



No comments

The Poisonous Employee-Ranking System That Helps Explain Microsoft’s Decline By Will Oremus

The Poisonous Employee-Ranking System That Helps Explain Microsoft’s Decline (slate.com) 

There were many reasons for the decline of Microsoft under Steve Ballmer, including, as I wrote this morning, its lack of focus and its habit of chasing trends rather than creating them. But one that’s not obvious to outsiders was the company’s employee evaluation system, known as “stack ranking.” The system—and its poisonous effects on Microsoft’s corporate culture—was best explained in an outstanding Vanity Fair feature by Kurt Eichenwald last year.

Anyone interested in Microsoft or business administration should read the full piece. But here’s an excerpt from the part where Eichenwald explains stack ranking:
At the center of the cultural problems was a management system called “stack ranking.” Every current and former Microsoft employee I interviewed—every one—cited stack ranking as the most destructive process inside of Microsoft, something that drove out untold numbers of employees. The system—also referred to as “the performance model,” “the bell curve,” or just “the employee review”—has, with certain variations over the years, worked like this: every unit was forced to declare a certain percentage of employees as top performers, then good performers, then average, then below average, then poor. …
For that reason, executives said, a lot of Microsoft superstars did everything they could to avoid working alongside other top-notch developers, out of fear that they would be hurt in the rankings. And the reviews had real-world consequences: those at the top received bonuses and promotions; those at the bottom usually received no cash or were shown the door. …
“The behavior this engenders, people do everything they can to stay out of the bottom bucket,” one Microsoft engineer said. “People responsible for features will openly sabotage other people’s efforts. One of the most valuable things I learned was to give the appearance of being courteous while withholding just enough information from colleagues to ensure they didn’t get ahead of me on the rankings.” Worse, because the reviews came every six months, employees and their supervisors—who were also ranked—focused on their short-term performance, rather than on longer efforts to innovate. …
So while Google was encouraging its employees to spend 20 percent of their time to work on ideas that excited them personally, Ballmer was inadvertently encouraging his to spend a good chunk of their time playing office politics. Why try to outrun the bear when you can just tie your co-workers' shoelaces?

Microsoft wasn’t the first company to adopt this sort of ranking system. It was actually popularized by Jack Welch at GE, where it was known as “rank and yank.” Welch defended the practice to the Wall Street Journal in a January 2012 article, saying, “This is not some mean system—this is the kindest form of management. [Low performers] are given a chance to improve, and if they don't in a year or so, you move them out. "

As the Journal and others have noted, what seemed to work for Welch—for a time, anyway—has produced some ugly results elsewhere. Even GE phased the system out following Welch’s departure. But in an interview with the Seattle Times just last month, Ballmer indicate that he was sticking with it. From the Seattle Times:
Q: A lot of people have slammed Microsoft’s stack ranking review system as contributing to a noncollaborative atmosphere. Is the kind of cultural change you want to effect possible with that stacked ranking system still in place?
A: We’re doing our performance reviews now. We’re finishing up our year (and there are) no changes to—no—I’ll say minor changes to our system. I think everybody wants to work in a high-performance culture where we reward people who are doing fantastic work, and we help people who are having a hard time find something else to do. Now, whether our existing performance-management system needs to change to meet the goal of fostering collaboration is something that Lisa Brummel [head of human resources] would take up.
It will be interesting to see whether Microsoft’s next CEO takes more personal responsibility for the company’s corporate culture—or leaves it for Lisa Brummel to take up.
No comments

Computer can read letters directly from the brain

 Computer can read letters directly from the brain (ru.nl)

By analysing MRI images of the brain with an elegant mathematical model, it is possible to reconstruct thoughts more accurately than ever before. In this way, researchers from Radboud University Nijmegen have succeeded in determining which letter a test subject was looking at. The journal Neuroimage has accepted the article, which will be published soon. A preliminary version of the article can be read online.

reading letters from the brain

Functional MRI scanners have been used in cognition research primarily to determine which brain areas are active while test subjects perform a specific task. The question is simple: is a particular brain region on or off? A research group at the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour at Radboud University has gone a step further: they have used data from the scanner to determine what a test subject is looking at. The researchers ‘taught' a model how small volumes of 2x2x2 mm from the brain scans - known as voxels - respond to individual pixels. By combining all the information about the pixels from the voxels, it became possible to reconstruct the image viewed by the subject. The result was not a clear image, but a somewhat fuzzy speckle pattern. In this study, the researchers used hand-written letters.

Prior knowledge improves model performance‘After this we did something new', says lead researcher Marcel van Gerven. ‘We gave the model prior knowledge: we taught it what letters look like. This improved the recognition of the letters enormously. The model compares the letters to determine which one corresponds most exactly with the speckle image, and then pushes the results of the image towards that letter. The result was the actual letter, a true reconstruction.'
‘Our approach is similar to how we believe the brain itself combines prior knowledge with sensory information. For example, you can recognise the lines and curves in this article as letters only after you have learned to read. And this is exactly what we are looking for: models that show what is happening in the brain in a realistic fashion. We hope to improve the models to such an extent that we can also apply them to the working memory or to subjective experiences such as dreams or visualisations. Reconstructions indicate whether the model you have created approaches reality.'

Improved resolution; more possibilities‘In our further research we will be working with a more powerful MRI scanner,' explains Sanne Schoenmakers, who is working on a thesis about decoding thoughts. ‘Due to the higher resolution of the scanner, we hope to be able to link the model to more detailed images. We are currently linking images of letters to 1200 voxels in the brain; with the more powerful scanner we will link images of faces to 15,000 voxels.'

Linear reconstruction of perceived images from human brain activity, Neuroimage, in press
S. Schoenmakers, M. Barth, T.Heskes, M.A.J. van GervenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
Institute for Computing and Information Sciences

Radboud University Nijmegen

This research has been supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.
No comments

NSA hacked into encrypted UN communications, leaked documents show

 NSA hacked into UN communications, leaked documents show (gigaom.com)

The NSA successfully cracked the encryption guarding the United Nations’ internal videoconferencing system, according to documents seen by Germany’s Der Spiegel.

The publication said on Sunday that the encryption’s bypassing took place in the summer of 2012, and that within three weeks the NSA had boosted the number of such decrypted communications from 12 to 458.

According to the documents leaked by Edward Snowden, on one occasion when the Americans were breaking into UN communications, they discovered the Chinese had tried to do the same. The UN headquarters are sited in New York. Spying on the United Nations is illegal under international law.

Der Spiegel‘s report also followed on from earlier revelations about the NSA bugging EU institutions, explaining that the U.S. agency gained access to the virtual private network (VPN) used by the EU’s embassies in America

It also claimed that the U.S. maintains a monitoring program called the “Special Collection Service” in over 80 embassies and consulates around the world, often without the knowledge of the host country.

In separate revelations on the weekend, the NSA admitted some agents had used the agency’s facilities to spy on their love interests. This allegedly only happened on a handful of occasions, but often enough to inspire the term “LOVEINT”. The Guardian reported that, in one case, an analyst had spied on his former spouse.
No comments

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Selling To The Fortune 500, Government, And Other Lovecraftian Horrors by Patrick McKenzie

Hiya guys! Patrick (patio11) here. You asked to get emails from me about making and selling software. Last time we talked about SaaS pricing, focusing on people paying in the tens to hundreds of dollars range. Today, we're going to talk about bigger fish.
A lot of folks have asked me about selling software to Big Freaking Enterprises. Big Freaking Enterprises are utterly price insensitive at price points you are contemplating (all amounts below $500 a month sound like rounding error), and having a few BFE clients grants you social proof to help sell other BFEs and smaller customers, as well. Nobody ever got fired for picking IBM, but if nobody at IBM got fired for picking you, then you must be good enough for Dr. Smith's office, right?
I was under a common engineer misapprehension that BFE sales requires playing golf, inviting clients to steak dinners, and having budgets beyond to reach of small businesses. This is not 100% true: you can hack the BFE procurement process to your advantage. Let's dig into how.



Understanding The B2B Purchasing Cycle So You Can Exploit It

Most folks reading this have seen one-half of the B2B purchasing cycle at their day jobs: they fill out a form or ask a manager for X (a copy of MSOffice, a new computer, etc), and six weeks later X arrives. You may have wondered whether the intervening six weeks required dark rituals of eldritch power. Nope, but don't tell Purchasing, as they treasure their reputations. Here's the typical workflow for a big business buying something "fairly small," i.e. below six figures. Feel free to skip this section if you're aware of it already -- there's meatier stuff below.
1. A User Needs Something. An internal user (i.e. low-ranking peon) discovers they need something. They ask for it.
2. Purchasing Agent Looks For Solutions Either that user or a person in the Purchasing Department identifies something to fit the need. They'll usually do this the exact way normal customers would: by Googling, sometimes assisted by an internal list of Vendors We've Worked With Before And Not Had To Sue To Get Delivery.
3. Purchasing Agent Sends Out Questions The person in charge of the purchase will ask a few businesses whether their product fits the needs identified on their paperwork (again, quite possibly written by a different person). This stage will often literally involve a spreadsheet with identified requirements listed on it. (Note how that matches up very well with those obnoxious checkbox charts you've seen on your competitors' websites? That is right, they know how this game is played.) Expect the overwhelming majority of these questions to be stupidly obvious and answered on the website, which the Purchasing Agent has not perused in its entirety because it is much easier to have you fill in the spreadsheet than to do it themselves.
4. Purchasing Agent Requests Quotes Businesses which replied with a spreadsheet containing almost all checks are asked for a formal quote. These are simply written attestations that Product X is available at price Y, with no shenanigans going on. (There are plenty of shenanigans going on, but this forces disclosure of the most obvious shenanigans, or at least the Purchasing Department thinks so.) In most cases for small purchases (again, less than six figures), the Purchasing Agent will only bother asking for one quote.
5. Purchasing Department Generates a Purchase Order (PO) The Purchasing Department will then create a Purchase Order (PO), which is a paper document saying "We accept your quote for Product X at Price Y, and request delivery, with payment to be made after delivery according to the following terms and conditions which we'll probably violate anyhow."
6a. Business Delivers The Product You know this part, right? You deliver your product to the internal user named on the documents, who may be shocked to receive it after only six short weeks. Their Purchasing Agent may not have told them the status of their request.
6b. (Approximately Contemporaneously) Business Invoices Accounts Payable You send an invoice (a formal demand for payment) to the Accounts Payable department at the business, which may or may not be the same as the Purchasing Department, depending on the peculiarities of your customer's org chart.
7. Accounts Payable Pays The Business Accounts Payable will then pay the business in the manner specified on the invoice. No, actually, they will ignore your instructions (especially about payment timeframes), and send a check to an address picked randomly from the set of them printed on the invoice. (Make sure you give them one easy, obvious option for where to send the checks, and that that mailbox is monitored for discrete envelopes containing paper worth potentially tens of thousands of dollars. You can get a check reissued but it will be extra pain and take another several weeks.)

The Easiest Hack Around The Purchasing Process

All internal users hate the purchasing process because it inhibits their ability to get work done. Successful Enterprise sales is about finding an internal champion who really wants your product like they want oxygen, and then allying with that person against their own employer. One of the easiest ways to do this is allowing them to exercise any loophole their Purchasing Department provides.
Because the whole rigamarole costs several hundred dollars in employee salary to approve any PO, most internal Purchasing Departments have a few enumerated exceptions. One is an upper limit on expenses a worker or low-level manager can approve on their own authority without ceremony, generally by putting them on a corporate credit card. This limit is customarily $500 or $1,000. The greatest hack the software industry came up with in the last twenty years is monthly billing, because it lets you sell a four-figure product for $499 a month, evading the internal purchasing controls which hamper your users from getting their work done. This is why substantially every SaaS business should have a plan priced between $250 and $499 a month, because corporate employees will expense it on the card. It is not their money so it doesn't matter whether it is $99, $250, or $4999 a month, as all those figures are literally rounding error to this customer, which is why they don't bother controlling for purchases that small. Accordingly, you should price to the high end of that range.
Some businesses do not have a corporate card available and will request to pay by PO all of the time. Your policy should be we are happy to take POs if you pre-pay for a year (optionally with a minimum plan level specified), which gets you out of the business of chasing two-figure POs every month, something which you urgently do not want. Your customer will be pleased with this, because they hate the work *they* have to do to get POs approved,

Dealing With The "You're Not Big Enough" Objection

You may be dealing with a larger transaction than the $500 exemption or with a more conservative business than the typical megacorp. (For example, hospitals and school systems are often very strict. Hospitals actually have money, so it is worth putting up with their layers of protective horsepuckey to get at it. As someone who sold to teachers for six years let me strongly suggest pounding your own hand with a hammer prior to selling to school districts. It is less painful and approximately as lucrative.)
One obstacle to making these sales at Stage 2/Stage 3 is that customers really want to see social proof, because they have the get-fired-if-this-doesn't-work-out worry. A typical phrase you will hear from customers at this point is "We don't want to be your biggest client." There are a variety of ways you can smooth over this objection, which I have stolen flagrantly from my friend Jason Cohen at WPEngine.
The best way is to contrast the level of service you can offer with that the competition can offer. You will always win this comparison if you phrase it correctly, regardless of whether e.g. the competition offers phone support and you do not.
The magic words are "I appreciate that you'd feel safer going with Brand Name X, and Brand Name X will indeed have someone around to answer your phone call at 2 AM. Unfortunately, they won't be able to do anything for you. Their only job is getting you off the phone before you can speak to someone capable of resolving your problem, because those people cost money. And you know what happens if you call at 2 PM? You get the same guy."
"On the other hand, when you send us an email, you may have to wait a few hours, but you'll get your response from me, every single time, and I will do my best to fix your problem. I built this product from the ground up and I am fanatical about taking care of you because you'd be my biggest customer, and if I don't take care of you, the business is over."
This is part of the magic founder advantage, by the way. Customers hate speaking to salespeople: they're pushy and poorly informed. Customers love talking to founders: they're transparently passionate about the product and always, always have an answer at their fingertips or know how to get one. You can press your founder advantage such that even "We'd love to do that but for X, Y, and Z it isn't feasible right now" sounds like a better response than "Oh, sure, we do that like we do everything. So how much can I put you down for?" will from your competition.

Bootstrapping Social Proof For Targeting Enterprises

Appointment Reminder, my newest software business, is currently a one-man operation with occasional support from freelancers. A particularly nationally renowned hospital included Appointment Reminder in the list of twelve companies it sent out spreadsheets to about a project it needed appointment reminders for. (Why'd they include AR? Because I rank #1 on Google for Appointment Reminder, and "If you're good enough for Google..." Seriously, direct quote.)
The particular project this hospital was engaging on did not have a six figure budget. (It is NDAed, but let's call it a $10k sale. It isn't, but it could be.) As a result, the sales teams for my competitors (smelling a non-motivational commission) perfunctorily sent back their standard data sheets and didn't persue the sale aggressively.
$10k is not a hugely motivational amount of money for me (believe me, I never, ever thought I'd be saying that) but I really, really wanted this hospital as an anchor client for Appointment Reminder. I wanted to be able to use their logo on my website and use that social proof as a wedge into the (large and extraordinarily lucrative) healthcare market. So I crazily overdelivered on the questions and concerns the user at the hospital had. You can crush arbitrarily large/sophisticated competition on small deals that are uneconomical for them to pursue with the goal of expanding into the core of the business. Clayton Christensen calls this "disruptive innovation." I personally like to think of the old line about how to eat an elephant: in small bites, starting at its vulnerable underbelly.
Twelve companies, with my competitors ranging from 10-man boutique consultancies to Fortune 500 companies, were asked whether their products would work for the hospital's needs. They sent perfunctory emails with just the generic attached data sheet.
I sent 2,000 word emails with paragraphs starting with "*Multi-user account isolation: yes*" and continuing with 200 words explaining exactly why that mattered for the particular hospital. (Copywriting tip #1: if you're ever talking to someone, use their name and their employer's name. Use it just a little more than you would think would be natural. Straight out of How To Win Friends and Influence People, still works as good as ever.) All of my emails suggested CCing to the internal team.
The hospital wanted a follow-up phone call with Appointment Reminder and the main competitor that survived the feature-grid comparison. If you're familiar with my market you can probably guess who they are, but suffice it to say they have 8 figures of sales a year and conservatively 100 man years in their software for every one I have in mine. I should lose on any comparison with them every single time. Their sales rep answered the questions on the call perfunctorily and superficially, and then went back to his more important leads.
When the hospital asked for the phone call with me, I remembered the name of the nurse doing the purchasing (we'll call her Jill), and thanked her for the email back-and-forth, then introduced myself as (again) "in charge of the product." She asked questions. I told her, every time, "I can go as deep into detail as this as you require, but I think XXXXX is about what your hospital cares about. Would you like to hear more?" When she got to questions which were actually hard, I said "I don't have a good answer for you right this minute, but I will follow-up with you over email with the specifics." Immediately after the phone call, I sent her an email (again, requesting a CC to the internal team) covering every question asked on the call, with a callout on the top that paragraphs 3, 7, and 9 were the ones I had promised to follow-up on.
Amusingly, in the phone call, Jill asked "I have to ask, is this product your baby? I mean, are you the only one there?" I said "Well, short answer: yes." I then cribbed liberally from Jason and said "It's a one-man company and, while I might have employees in the future, at present I don't. I wrote the product myself, answer all the questions myself, and do all the support myself. And, like you can imagine, I take very good care of my baby."
The hospital had an internal meeting with ten attendees to decide which product to go forward with. Every person other than Jill understood the meeting as "Deciding between Appointment Reminder and whatever that other company is", because their inboxes had had two emails with extensive commentary from Patrick at Appointment Reminder and a PDF filed forwarded from "some guy" which every doctor had promised to read some day when there were no lives to be saved. The lead doctor wanted to go with the 8,000 lb gorilla. Jill relayed the baby story, with a strong personal recommendation.
And that's how I outcompeted my biggest competitor and won an enterprise sale as a single guy running his business from Japan. If you're curious as to who the hospital is, keep an eye on the Appointment Reminder home page, as in only a few more short months I should be able to mention them publicly.
I won't lie to you: doing Enterprise sales is long, hard work. I've probably invested 25 hours into pushing paperwork on this one over six months, and there have been another dozen stories which started like this one and then ended at the select-down prior to the in-depth phone calls. But hey, sale made and beachhead established in an extraordinarily lucrative market segment with huge barriers to entry.
Interestingly, after you have a beachhead, broadening it is a hundred times easier. In addition to the next "But you're so small" objection being answerable with "I'm good enough for $NAMEDROP_LIKE_A_PRO but if you're still concerned...", it turns out that the hospital was using the service with several partner hospitals, all of some reputation. I essentially picked up eight customer logos for the "price" of one.

Customers Sometimes Want To Opt-In To Enterprise Pricing. Let Them.

Your pipeline is to high-touch sales as your funnel is to low-touch sales via your website. That's how I've always seen at it, coming from a low-touch background. Sales guys see it as something like "You become aware that a hundred prospective customers exist. You winnow your list down to 20 of them who are qualified leads, the ones with the best prospect of purchasing your product. You call them and get meaningful interaction with 10 decisionmakers. You get three product demos. One of them converts into a sale, and you get a commission check."
You will eventually want to get past the point where all sales comes from one of the founders doing a time-intensive song and dance yourself. This desire eventually results in the dreaded Defined, Repeatable Sales Process. You can hack your way around needing to have one of those (and/or a sales team), though. These strategies also transition perfectly well to doing Enterprise sales "for real."
Your self-service low-touch software/SaaS product, for example, can serve as a source of extraordinarily qualified sales leads for a higher level of offering. For example, a big company happily using the $250 a month plan could, quite possibly, be happy to upgrade to a $5,000 a month contract if you offered them the right incentive. (Twenty times as much, you ask? No, transitioning from "pocket lint" to pennies. Stop thinking like a human. Think like a corporation. Corporations are like humans whose smallest increment of currency is the largest paycheck you've ever received.)
How would you segment folks who need a higher offering? In many cases, they'll self-segment by asking you questions, such as "Does the software have auditing capabilities?
There are three easy answers to this question:
  • No, it doesn't. Sorry.
  • No, it doesn't, but we can build that for you.
  • Yes, it does. We just have to do the X and the Y and the Z and, bam, auditing.
Smack yourself if you ever say any one of these answers.
Auditing is one of several Enterprise pricing trigger words. (See also: "compliance", "administrator", "permissions", "firewall", "multi-lingual", "contract", "SLA", etc), If you sincerely care about auditing, you have more money than God. Accordingly, the right answer is some variation of "We make auditing available to our Enterprise customers. When would you like to have a call about your needs?" You then close that sale at an unpublished enterprise price point, which will probably be thousands of dollars a month.
This is important: Enterprise pricing is discontinuous with normal pricing. If the $250 a month plan entitles you to 500 foozles and an Enterprise needs 5,000 foozles, that costs thousands or tens thousands of dollars per month. If an Enterprise only needs 500 foozles, that costs thousands or tens of thousands of dollars per month. If an Enterprise only needs 50 foozles, that costs thousands or tens of thousands of dollars per month. This is partially justified by the amount of pain you're signing up for by doing an Enterprise sales process, but is mostly just pure, naked price discrimination. Enterprises are not price conscious*. Don't attempt to sell them based on your price. (* For prices customarily contemplated by software companies.)
I meet a lot of developers who learn about pricing primarily through reading other people's SaaS pricing pages. Like we discussed in the email on SaaS pricing, even if the pricing page doesn't explicitly say it, there is *probably* an option to pay an arbitrarily high amount for any SaaS you have ever heard of. I know of companies who have policies against doing this sort of thing (37signals famously does, for example) but there are many successful SaaS companies who have a magic lever available to make your experience of them totally disconnected from their standard offering. The existence of that lever is not often disclosed.
Here's an example I know won't rub anyone wrong: Github has Enterprise pricing available, and the magic segmenting feature is "behind your firewall." Did you know you can trivially pay five or six figures a year for a Github account? Quick, guess, where does Github make more money: all of their $7 a month personal accounts put together or their largest single Enterprise customer? I know which one I'm betting on.

Scaling Your Sales Pipeline Up

Sometimes customers won't come out and tell you "Hey, I'm price insensitive, please charge me 20 times as much." They can often demonstrate it through behavior, though. For example, let's say you hypothetically wanted to get people to talk to you about their auditing requirements. You could put Call Us copy on your pricing page. Many of your customers (because they know how the game is played) will correctly read that to mean "We have Enterprise service available and it is, as you would expect, expensive." Where else can you collect that lead, without requring ongoing involvement from the founding team?
Have you considered asking for it in your application? For example, just drop a setting in the Account Settings menu. "Auditing: turn on". If someone clicks it, display a message saying "Your plan level doesn't include auditing but we'll be in touch. Click here if you don't want to hear from us." If they don't click that link, fire yourself an email saying "Bob Smith (bob@example.com) was interested in: Auditing." Then follow up with Bob personally. You just turned 5 minutes of engineer time into the start of a repeatable pipeline for getting six-figure deals. Good on you.
(If you're discomfit by that idea, you can write microcopy which you'll be more comfortable with, like "Auditing: click here to schedule a phone call about Auditing with our sales team." But that's extra work and, believe me, you care more about the difference than your customers do. This is not their first rodeo -- as an Enterprise, they have institutional experience of dealing with Enterprise sales thousands of times.)
Another method: send your customers a sequence of emails, often called "drip marketing", with a mixture beginning with straight-up education as to how to use the software to solve their problems. Gradually, you can transition the emails from less education and more selling on the benefits available of transitioning to your Enterprise model. (If you want to be really sophisticated, send this only to folks whose accounts suggest possible enterprise-ness about them. Myself, I'd be inclined to suggest e.g. "A one-month email course on getting the most out of X" to everyone at signup, making sure the typical customer would enjoy the first few emails, and then giving everyone a one-click opt-out if the Enterprise sales material doesn't ring their bell.) You can pitch the benefits of your Enterprise services, such as e.g. dedicated support staff or a Service Level Agreement or what have you. Your happy internal customer might recognize the benfits of upgrading to these or (the same for your purposes) be required to take advantage of them by internal rules, and accordingly those emails might spark fruitful conversations with your sales teams.
Not sure what I mean by "internal rules"? Consider a Pricing Department which, having been burned on a software purchase before, has a bullet-point "All software purchases must include one year of maintenance with a minimum service level guarantee of tier two support being available within 6 hours." You know what that means from your perspective? "This Purchasing Department will reject any PO for the $250 a month plan and require that our customer upgrade to the $5,000 a month plan, if it is communicated to us that the $250 plan does not come with an SLA." This strongly adding the following line-item to quotes: "Support: Email support on a best-effort basis. No SLA purchased; available separately. price: (included)" That line will virtually never torpedo as purchase, but will sometimes result in 20x-ing the purchase price.
Still another method: You've got a dashboard with everyone who signed up in the last day on it, right? (RIGHT?) If someone with an email address ending with e.g. boeing.com signs up, make sure they get a hand-written letter from the founder or project manager offering to talk about their concerns. (I see no particular reason why you can't give everyone who signs up the same letter, but I'd devote more of my concentration to making sure a conversation actually happened if a customer was from boeing.com versus a generic gmail address.)

Anyone Can Do Enterprise Sales

One of the most common objections I hear from folks thinking about moving upmarket into the enterprise is that they're not cut out to be Sales Guys. Guys, believe me, I used to play World of Warcraft and still often stare at my own shoes while talking. Nobody is less qualified to be a Sales Guy than me. It is a skill, though, like any other. Try it. Fail a few times. You'll get better at it, eventually. I had maybe a 5% hit rate when I started out doing sales on Appointment Reminder, if that. It is 20% now, which (when you multiply by the formidable budgets of companies in the space) works out to be quite a bit of money. As my father always counselled me with regards to dating advice: "Don't come up with reasons for them being out of your league. Make them come up with them. Someday, someone -- perhaps someone surprising -- will say Yes." (n.b. Equally good advice in the original context.)
Until next time.
Regards,
Patrick McKenzie
P.S. I always appreciate getting email from you about what you'd like to hear about next.

Source:  Patrick McKenzie
No comments

Four fears for authoritarians by Paul Bernal's Blog

“It is not power that corrupts but fear. Fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it” Aung San Suu Kyi: Freedom from Fear
Recent events in the UK have been disturbing for believers and supporters of civil liberties. In many ways it feels as though our civil liberties are under a greater, more sustained attack than at any time since the Blair inspired near-paranoia that led to ideas such as the ID card database, the Interception Modernisation Programme (the predecessor of the Snoopers’ Charter) and 42 day detention amongst other hideously illiberal measures. What is perhaps more dangerous is that today’s attacks are in some ways more insidious, more seemingly disconnected, more apparently ‘reasonable’ when considered individually and hence more likely to gain public support – even by those who consider themselves to be very much supporters of human rights. Make no mistake about it, though: they are connected, and inspired by the same sense of fear that inspired Blair, Straw, Blunkett et al. They’re inspired by the same fear that have enveloped authoritarians for centuries: a fear of losing control.
1) Fear of a strong, independent, determined press
An independent press is the scourge of the authoritarian – and authoritarians know it all too well. The powerful have never liked a free press – from the pamphleteers of the 18th century to Tygodnik Solidarność in Communist Poland, an independent, brave and determined press has been crucial to the resistance to oppression. That’s why, regardless of the legality or otherwise of their actions, the Government’s first supervising the smashing of the Guardian’s laptops and then detaining David Miranda should be viewed very seriously indeed. It’s an attempt to stifle, to cow, to intimidate and to control the press. That’s serious. Very serious indeed.
2) Fear that people will learn what they’re doing
Authoritarians everywhere want their own actions, their own methods, their own systems to remain secret. they don’t want the ordinary people to know what they’re doing – partly because when people know what they’re doing, they generally object, partly because the authoritarians know that what they’re doing is in many ways wrong, partly because if people know what’s going on they can take measures against it. Make no bones about it, the Snowden revelations matter – it matters that we know about the level of surveillance that the authorities are performing, and how much they’re lying about it.
3) Fear that people are hiding things from them
The idea that people are hiding their thoughts, their plans, their associations – even their thoughts and dreams – is perhaps the thing that scares authoritarians the most. That’s why they consistently spy on their own citizens, using whatever methods they can find. In Burma, it was estimated that more than 1/3 of the populace was paid to inform the authorities, whilst the Stasi’s use of informants and other spies is now stuff of legend. The current obsession with internet surveillance – both legally, using the Snoopers’ Charter and its equivalents worldwide and ‘quasi-legally’ using the techniques and systems of PRISM, Tempora and so forth – is a reflection of that same fear, that same concern that people are hiding things. It’s an obsession that amounts, ultimately, to a belief that your entire nation, your own populace, is suspicious. We could all be traitors and enemies of the state – so we should all be watched. Orwell understood this – which is why 1984 hits the nerves so closely, and rings so true.
4) Fear that people can learn too much
A knowledgeable populace is a dangerous populace – so a good authoritarian has to control access to information. That’s why books are burned, that’s why censors are employed, that’s why education is closely controlled – and why, in the current technological climate, the internet is considered so dangerous. That, not the fear of pornography, is the key to the current plans to censor the internet. I’m not saying that the likes of Claire Perry think in these terms: I’m quite sure she doesn’t. Her desires for censorship come from another, not wholly unrelated angle: the idea of controlling the morals of the populace. Claire Perry, however, is being used by others who wish to take greater control over what people can learn – control of pornography is in some ways a Trojan Horse, to allow control over everything. Once the filters are built, the terms upon which they can filter can be (indeed will be) modified. It allows control over information – and hence over the populace.
It’s all about control – and the internet
Ultimately, control is the bottom line. All these events, all these actions, are about control. Controlling the press. preventing people learning about government actions, spying on people in their every action, controlling what they can have access to – it’s all about control. These aren’t separate issues: they all interlink, and the internet is the mechanism through which they link. To control the information people have access to online, you need to know what they’re doing online. To control the newspapers, you have to control the internet, because these days that’s how the newspapers distribute their information, far more than by print. That means, amongst other things, controlling twitter – which is why the authorities are getting keener and keener to control twitter, and why they will latch onto every opportunity to do so, whether that be the desire to stop trolling or abuse, or to control for copyright and so forth.
We need to see this bigger picture – and resist this drive for control. Some of the elements may seem eminently reasonable – most notably the porn-filters and the desire to root out abusive tweeters – but we need to understand the bigger picture too. We need to consider slippery slopes – even if that means we get ridiculed as conspiracy theorists. If the Snowden story tells us nothing else, it should tell us that not all conspiracy theorists are wrong. The stakes here are very high indeed – it’s about freedom itself.

Source: Four fears for authoritarians
No comments